![\"\"](\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F2675447%2F3c6027260d616e92b5813ff304697c0c%2Fwl_target.png?generation=1723732952046868&alt=media\")
please correct me if my understanding is not correct.
\nThere is certainly some wavelength dependent distribution for the target. These are normalized targets for the two stars in train:
\n
As this is the apparent size of the planet, similar signals are expected from the time series data.
", "rawMarkdown": "There is certainly some wavelength dependent distribution for the target. These are normalized targets for the two stars in train:\n\n\n\nAs this is the apparent size of the planet, similar signals are expected from the time series data.", "votes": 3, "replies": [ { "id": 2960797, "postDate": "2024-08-16T06:46:40.920Z", "content": "in all of the notebook , they are summing all the wavelength together for making the time series
\nfor example in this
\n![\"\"](\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F15643980%2F53ec793b1d2b056375b1d464ddf8d071%2FScreenshot%202024-08-16%20121044.png?generation=1723790509966429&alt=media\")
we have 282 wavelength, so why we are summing all the wavelength together when creating time series
\nwe need to sum individual wavelength all the y axis only and this will give 283 time series plot for each observation instead of just one.
Nobody ever claimed that the public notebooks are optimal. Certainly makes sense to try a wavelength only summing, too.
", "rawMarkdown": "Nobody ever claimed that the public notebooks are optimal. Certainly makes sense to try a wavelength only summing, too.", "votes": 3 }, { "id": 2960839, "postDate": "2024-08-16T07:47:39.597Z", "content": "thank you so much , i was just trying to understand if my understanding is correct or not.
", "rawMarkdown": "thank you so much , i was just trying to understand if my understanding is correct or not." }, { "id": 2960922, "postDate": "2024-08-16T09:45:31.823Z", "content": "We would like to remind everyone that, summing all the wavelengths together is the easiest way to present a \"white\" light curve/ showing the dip. It is also worth considering other ways to capture the signal, summing is a quick way to show the transit
", "rawMarkdown": "We would like to remind everyone that, summing all the wavelengths together is the easiest way to present a \"white\" light curve/ showing the dip. It is also worth considering other ways to capture the signal, summing is a quick way to show the transit ", "votes": 3 } ] } ] }, { "id": 2960040, "postDate": "2024-08-15T14:37:35.393Z", "content": "please correct me if my understanding is not correct.
\nThere is certainly some wavelength dependent distribution for the target. These are normalized targets for the two stars in train:
\n
As this is the apparent size of the planet, similar signals are expected from the time series data.
", "votes": 3, "replies": [ { "id": 2960797, "author_name": "ved prakash", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2024-08-16T06:46:40.920000", "content": "in all of the notebook , they are summing all the wavelength together for making the time series
\nfor example in this
\n
we have 282 wavelength, so why we are summing all the wavelength together when creating time series
\nwe need to sum individual wavelength all the y axis only and this will give 283 time series plot for each observation instead of just one.
Nobody ever claimed that the public notebooks are optimal. Certainly makes sense to try a wavelength only summing, too.
", "votes": 3, "replies": [] }, { "id": 2960839, "author_name": "ved prakash", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2024-08-16T07:47:39.597000", "content": "thank you so much , i was just trying to understand if my understanding is correct or not.
", "votes": 0, "replies": [] }, { "id": 2960922, "author_name": "Gordon Yip", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2024-08-16T09:45:31.823000", "content": "We would like to remind everyone that, summing all the wavelengths together is the easiest way to present a \"white\" light curve/ showing the dip. It is also worth considering other ways to capture the signal, summing is a quick way to show the transit
", "votes": 3, "replies": [] } ] } ] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "2960053": "There is certainly some wavelength dependent distribution for the target. These are normalized targets for the two stars in train:\n\n\n\nAs this is the apparent size of the planet, similar signals are expected from the time series data.", "2960040": "please correct me if my understanding is not correct.\n- for every wavelength we will have different dip in the time series plot for AIRS_CHO dataset?" } }