{
  "id": 529690,
  "title": "Integration times discrepancy",
  "url": "/competitions/ariel-data-challenge-2024/discussion/529690",
  "author_name": "greySnow",
  "post_date": "2024-08-22T10:57:34.332000",
  "votes": 1,
  "comment_count": 1,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>From the <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/code/gordonyip/calibrating-a-single-observation\" target=\"_blank\">calibration notebook</a>, it is apparent that the integration time for FGS1 is 0.1 both for the first and the second measurements, while for AIRS-CH0 it's 0.1, 4.5. <br>\nSumming up all the integration times, we get for FGS1 0.1*135000 = 13500s, while for AIRS-CH0, it's 5625*0.1+5625*4.5 = 25875s. However, when looking at the data, e.g. <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/code/bingyuniu/neurips-ariel-2024-starter-withdifferentparametr\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>, it's evident that the total time for FGS1 and AIRS-CH0 measurements is equal. How do I solve this discrepancy? Does anyone have any idea?</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": 2966904,
      "postDate": "2024-08-22T10:57:34.333Z",
      "content": "<p>From the <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/code/gordonyip/calibrating-a-single-observation\" target=\"_blank\">calibration notebook</a>, it is apparent that the integration time for FGS1 is 0.1 both for the first and the second measurements, while for AIRS-CH0 it's 0.1, 4.5. <br>\nSumming up all the integration times, we get for FGS1 0.1*135000 = 13500s, while for AIRS-CH0, it's 5625*0.1+5625*4.5 = 25875s. However, when looking at the data, e.g. <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/code/bingyuniu/neurips-ariel-2024-starter-withdifferentparametr\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>, it's evident that the total time for FGS1 and AIRS-CH0 measurements is equal. How do I solve this discrepancy? Does anyone have any idea?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "From the [calibration notebook](https://www.kaggle.com/code/gordonyip/calibrating-a-single-observation), it is apparent that the integration time for FGS1 is 0.1 both for the first and the second measurements, while for AIRS-CH0 it's 0.1, 4.5. \nSumming up all the integration times, we get for FGS1 0.1\\*135000 = 13500s, while for AIRS-CH0, it's 5625\\*0.1+5625\\*4.5 = 25875s. However, when looking at the data, e.g. [here](https://www.kaggle.com/code/bingyuniu/neurips-ariel-2024-starter-withdifferentparametr), it's evident that the total time for FGS1 and AIRS-CH0 measurements is equal. How do I solve this discrepancy? Does anyone have any idea?",
      "votes": 1
    },
    {
      "id": 2967412,
      "postDate": "2024-08-22T21:29:11.637Z",
      "content": "<p>this discussion may help: <br>\n<a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/code/gordonyip/update-calibrating-and-binning-astronomical-data/comments#2964529\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/code/gordonyip/update-calibrating-and-binning-astronomical-data/comments#2964529</a></p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "this discussion may help: \nhttps://www.kaggle.com/code/gordonyip/update-calibrating-and-binning-astronomical-data/comments#2964529\n"
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 2967412,
      "author_name": "Gordon Yip",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2024-08-22T21:29:11.637000",
      "content": "<p>this discussion may help: <br>\n<a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/code/gordonyip/update-calibrating-and-binning-astronomical-data/comments#2964529\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/code/gordonyip/update-calibrating-and-binning-astronomical-data/comments#2964529</a></p>",
      "votes": 0,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "2966904": "From the [calibration notebook](https://www.kaggle.com/code/gordonyip/calibrating-a-single-observation), it is apparent that the integration time for FGS1 is 0.1 both for the first and the second measurements, while for AIRS-CH0 it's 0.1, 4.5. \nSumming up all the integration times, we get for FGS1 0.1\\*135000 = 13500s, while for AIRS-CH0, it's 5625\\*0.1+5625\\*4.5 = 25875s. However, when looking at the data, e.g. [here](https://www.kaggle.com/code/bingyuniu/neurips-ariel-2024-starter-withdifferentparametr), it's evident that the total time for FGS1 and AIRS-CH0 measurements is equal. How do I solve this discrepancy? Does anyone have any idea?",
    "2967412": "this discussion may help: \nhttps://www.kaggle.com/code/gordonyip/update-calibrating-and-binning-astronomical-data/comments#2964529\n"
  }
}