{ "id": 521750, "title": "Recap of Competition - Congratulations to the Winners!", "url": "/competitions/leap-atmospheric-physics-ai-climsim/discussion/521750", "author_name": "Elizabeth Park", "post_date": "2024-07-22T17:18:50.990000", "votes": 3, "comment_count": 7, "views": 0, "content": "

Hi Kagglers,

\n

We’re happy to announce the conclusion of the LEAP - Atmospheric Physics using AI (ClimSim) competition. Thank you everyone for your participation!

\n

This competition ended with 5,182 registrations and 877 participants on 693 teams. We had 11,059 submissions from 66 countries. For 113 users (including 15 in the top 100!), this was their first competition. Thank you all for your hard work in this competition and congratulations to our winners and to those who gained a new ranking!

\n

The top potential winning teams will be contacted via email for the next steps. We look forward to learning more about their winning solutions.

\n

We've cleaned the leaderboard and disqualified some teams that have violated the rules. If you think you were removed by mistake, or believe you have evidence that suggests another team cheated, please contact compliance. Please fill in all the fields honestly.

\n

We highly encourage you to post a solution write-up about your approach and solution in the forums (see instructions) after the host has fully vetted the winners. You may also refer to Kaggle Solution Write-Up Documentation for guidance. You are also encouraged to publish your models on Kaggle Models!

\n

Thanks for continuing to make Kaggle a great place to learn, practice, and test data science techniques!

\n

Happy Modeling!
\nKaggle Team

", "messages": [ { "id": 2932203, "postDate": "2024-07-22T17:18:50.990Z", "content": "

Hi Kagglers,

\n

We’re happy to announce the conclusion of the LEAP - Atmospheric Physics using AI (ClimSim) competition. Thank you everyone for your participation!

\n

This competition ended with 5,182 registrations and 877 participants on 693 teams. We had 11,059 submissions from 66 countries. For 113 users (including 15 in the top 100!), this was their first competition. Thank you all for your hard work in this competition and congratulations to our winners and to those who gained a new ranking!

\n

The top potential winning teams will be contacted via email for the next steps. We look forward to learning more about their winning solutions.

\n

We've cleaned the leaderboard and disqualified some teams that have violated the rules. If you think you were removed by mistake, or believe you have evidence that suggests another team cheated, please contact compliance. Please fill in all the fields honestly.

\n

We highly encourage you to post a solution write-up about your approach and solution in the forums (see instructions) after the host has fully vetted the winners. You may also refer to Kaggle Solution Write-Up Documentation for guidance. You are also encouraged to publish your models on Kaggle Models!

\n

Thanks for continuing to make Kaggle a great place to learn, practice, and test data science techniques!

\n

Happy Modeling!
\nKaggle Team

", "rawMarkdown": "Hi Kagglers,\n\nWe’re happy to announce the conclusion of the LEAP - Atmospheric Physics using AI (ClimSim) competition. Thank you everyone for your participation!\n\nThis competition ended with 5,182 registrations and 877 participants on 693 teams. We had 11,059 submissions from 66 countries. For 113 users (including 15 in the top 100!), this was their first competition. Thank you all for your hard work in this competition and congratulations to our winners and to those who gained a new ranking! \n\nThe top potential winning teams will be contacted via email for the next steps. We look forward to learning more about their winning solutions.\n\nWe've cleaned the leaderboard and disqualified some teams that have violated the rules. If you think you were removed by mistake, or believe you have evidence that suggests another team cheated, please contact [compliance](https://www.kaggle.com/compliance). Please fill in all the fields honestly.\n\nWe highly encourage you to post a solution write-up about your approach and solution in the forums (see [instructions](https://www.kaggle.com/discussions/product-feedback/373153)) after the host has [fully vetted the winners](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/leap-atmospheric-physics-ai-climsim/discussion/521750#2932361). You may also refer to [Kaggle Solution Write-Up Documentation](https://www.kaggle.com/solution-write-up-documentation) for guidance. You are also encouraged to [publish your models on Kaggle Models](https://www.kaggle.com/docs/models#publishing-a-model)!\n\nThanks for continuing to make Kaggle a great place to learn, practice, and test data science techniques!\n\nHappy Modeling!\nKaggle Team\n", "votes": 3 }, { "id": 2932340, "postDate": "2024-07-22T20:12:27.380Z", "content": "
\n

We highly encourage you to post a solution write-up about your approach and solution in the forums (see instructions). You may also refer to Kaggle Solution Write-Up Documentation for guidance. You are also encouraged to publish your models on Kaggle Models!

\n
\n

@elizabethpark Are you following this topic?

\n

https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/leap-atmospheric-physics-ai-climsim/discussion/520084#2922293

\n

In my understanding all of participants should not share their solutions until the solution check process is over to avoid potential leak-exploited winner steal solutions. The host seems to officially agrees this idea.

\n

@jerrylin96 What do you say about this topic?

", "rawMarkdown": "> We highly encourage you to post a solution write-up about your approach and solution in the forums (see instructions). You may also refer to Kaggle Solution Write-Up Documentation for guidance. You are also encouraged to publish your models on Kaggle Models!\n\n@elizabethpark Are you following this topic?\n\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/competitions/leap-atmospheric-physics-ai-climsim/discussion/520084#2922293\n\nIn my understanding all of participants should not share their solutions until the solution check process is over to avoid potential leak-exploited winner steal solutions. The host seems to officially agrees this idea.\n\n@jerrylin96 What do you say about this topic?", "votes": 2, "replies": [ { "id": 2932413, "postDate": "2024-07-22T22:55:52.300Z", "content": "

Hi 'bilzard'! Thank you for sharing your concern - Per host guidance, we have updated the above message to clarify that solutions should be published after the hosting team validates the winning solutions.

", "rawMarkdown": "Hi 'bilzard'! Thank you for sharing your concern - Per host guidance, we have updated the above message to clarify that solutions should be published after the hosting team validates the winning solutions. ", "votes": 1 } ] }, { "id": 2932280, "postDate": "2024-07-22T18:42:05.697Z", "content": "

Hi, thanks for sharing these figures ! Does it mean that we can publish solution write-ups now ?

", "rawMarkdown": "Hi, thanks for sharing these figures ! Does it mean that we can publish solution write-ups now ? ", "replies": [ { "id": 2932305, "postDate": "2024-07-22T19:15:22.703Z", "content": "

Hi 'Albanito'! The winning teams should follow the host request to wait until validation, but the rest of the teams can publish solution write-ups. Thank you for checking in!

", "rawMarkdown": "Hi 'Albanito'! The winning teams should follow the host request to wait until validation, but the rest of the teams can publish solution write-ups. Thank you for checking in!", "replies": [ { "id": 2932342, "postDate": "2024-07-22T20:18:57.900Z", "content": "
\n

The winning teams should follow the host request to wait until validation, but the rest of the teams can publish solution write-ups.

\n
\n

@elizabethpark It’s unclear potential leak-exploited winner can steal some hint from shared solution even if they are not prized winner. So I believe this rule (don’t share solutions until the solution check process end) should be applied to everyone including non-prized participants.

\n

c.f.)
\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/competitions/leap-atmospheric-physics-ai-climsim/discussion/521750#2932340

\n

@jerrylin96 Could you confirm that?

", "rawMarkdown": "> The winning teams should follow the host request to wait until validation, but the rest of the teams can publish solution write-ups.\n\n@elizabethpark It’s unclear potential leak-exploited winner can steal some hint from shared solution even if they are not prized winner. So I believe this rule (don’t share solutions until the solution check process end) should be applied to everyone including non-prized participants.\n\nc.f.)\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/competitions/leap-atmospheric-physics-ai-climsim/discussion/521750#2932340\n\n@jerrylin96 Could you confirm that?" }, { "id": 2932361, "postDate": "2024-07-22T21:14:27.667Z", "content": "

I don't want to override the opinion of Kaggle staff, but I would personally prefer an embargo of solutions until we have fully vetted the winners. We are hoping to get this done by Aug 3, assuming we get all of the materials on time.

", "rawMarkdown": "I don't want to override the opinion of Kaggle staff, but I would personally prefer an embargo of solutions until we have fully vetted the winners. We are hoping to get this done by Aug 3, assuming we get all of the materials on time. ", "votes": 3 }, { "id": 2932412, "postDate": "2024-07-22T22:50:21.340Z", "content": "

Thank you Jerry. We have updated the above post to encourage posting after the winners are fully vetted.

", "rawMarkdown": "Thank you Jerry. We have updated the above post to encourage posting after the winners are fully vetted.", "votes": 1 } ] } ] } ], "comments": [ { "id": 2932340, "author_name": "Bilzard", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2024-07-22T20:12:27.380000", "content": "
\n

We highly encourage you to post a solution write-up about your approach and solution in the forums (see instructions). You may also refer to Kaggle Solution Write-Up Documentation for guidance. You are also encouraged to publish your models on Kaggle Models!

\n
\n

@elizabethpark Are you following this topic?

\n

https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/leap-atmospheric-physics-ai-climsim/discussion/520084#2922293

\n

In my understanding all of participants should not share their solutions until the solution check process is over to avoid potential leak-exploited winner steal solutions. The host seems to officially agrees this idea.

\n

@jerrylin96 What do you say about this topic?

", "votes": 2, "replies": [ { "id": 2932413, "author_name": "Elizabeth Park", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2024-07-22T22:55:52.300000", "content": "

Hi 'bilzard'! Thank you for sharing your concern - Per host guidance, we have updated the above message to clarify that solutions should be published after the hosting team validates the winning solutions.

", "votes": 1, "replies": [] } ] }, { "id": 2932280, "author_name": "Albanito", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2024-07-22T18:42:05.697000", "content": "

Hi, thanks for sharing these figures ! Does it mean that we can publish solution write-ups now ?

", "votes": 0, "replies": [ { "id": 2932305, "author_name": "Elizabeth Park", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2024-07-22T19:15:22.703000", "content": "

Hi 'Albanito'! The winning teams should follow the host request to wait until validation, but the rest of the teams can publish solution write-ups. Thank you for checking in!

", "votes": 0, "replies": [ { "id": 2932342, "author_name": "Bilzard", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2024-07-22T20:18:57.900000", "content": "
\n

The winning teams should follow the host request to wait until validation, but the rest of the teams can publish solution write-ups.

\n
\n

@elizabethpark It’s unclear potential leak-exploited winner can steal some hint from shared solution even if they are not prized winner. So I believe this rule (don’t share solutions until the solution check process end) should be applied to everyone including non-prized participants.

\n

c.f.)
\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/competitions/leap-atmospheric-physics-ai-climsim/discussion/521750#2932340

\n

@jerrylin96 Could you confirm that?

", "votes": 0, "replies": [] }, { "id": 2932361, "author_name": "Jerry Lin", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2024-07-22T21:14:27.667000", "content": "

I don't want to override the opinion of Kaggle staff, but I would personally prefer an embargo of solutions until we have fully vetted the winners. We are hoping to get this done by Aug 3, assuming we get all of the materials on time.

", "votes": 3, "replies": [] }, { "id": 2932412, "author_name": "Elizabeth Park", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2024-07-22T22:50:21.340000", "content": "

Thank you Jerry. We have updated the above post to encourage posting after the winners are fully vetted.

", "votes": 1, "replies": [] } ] } ] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "2932203": "Hi Kagglers,\n\nWe’re happy to announce the conclusion of the LEAP - Atmospheric Physics using AI (ClimSim) competition. Thank you everyone for your participation!\n\nThis competition ended with 5,182 registrations and 877 participants on 693 teams. We had 11,059 submissions from 66 countries. For 113 users (including 15 in the top 100!), this was their first competition. Thank you all for your hard work in this competition and congratulations to our winners and to those who gained a new ranking! \n\nThe top potential winning teams will be contacted via email for the next steps. We look forward to learning more about their winning solutions.\n\nWe've cleaned the leaderboard and disqualified some teams that have violated the rules. If you think you were removed by mistake, or believe you have evidence that suggests another team cheated, please contact [compliance](https://www.kaggle.com/compliance). Please fill in all the fields honestly.\n\nWe highly encourage you to post a solution write-up about your approach and solution in the forums (see [instructions](https://www.kaggle.com/discussions/product-feedback/373153)) after the host has [fully vetted the winners](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/leap-atmospheric-physics-ai-climsim/discussion/521750#2932361). You may also refer to [Kaggle Solution Write-Up Documentation](https://www.kaggle.com/solution-write-up-documentation) for guidance. You are also encouraged to [publish your models on Kaggle Models](https://www.kaggle.com/docs/models#publishing-a-model)!\n\nThanks for continuing to make Kaggle a great place to learn, practice, and test data science techniques!\n\nHappy Modeling!\nKaggle Team\n", "2932340": "> We highly encourage you to post a solution write-up about your approach and solution in the forums (see instructions). You may also refer to Kaggle Solution Write-Up Documentation for guidance. You are also encouraged to publish your models on Kaggle Models!\n\n@elizabethpark Are you following this topic?\n\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/competitions/leap-atmospheric-physics-ai-climsim/discussion/520084#2922293\n\nIn my understanding all of participants should not share their solutions until the solution check process is over to avoid potential leak-exploited winner steal solutions. The host seems to officially agrees this idea.\n\n@jerrylin96 What do you say about this topic?", "2932280": "Hi, thanks for sharing these figures ! Does it mean that we can publish solution write-ups now ? " } }