![\"\"](\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F864495%2F06fd047dea4911ad7f414c6b0bad266e%2FEFysf8hXoAMWdM6.png?generation=1570035618408556&alt=media\")
It is interesting to mention in the context of this competition that the first brain CT scan was taken on 1 october 1971.
\n\nThose who train their model on 64x64 images must be happy to potentially generalize on this historical one:\n
I believe there is a mass lesion in the right frontal lobe, but, to be honest, I'm quite unsure if there is any intracranial hemorrhage! My guess would be 'any' = 0. Any opposing prediction from your well regularized model or from brave experts ?
", "messages": [ { "id": 639014, "postDate": "2019-10-02T17:09:21.240Z", "content": "It is interesting to mention in the context of this competition that the first brain CT scan was taken on 1 october 1971.
\n\nThose who train their model on 64x64 images must be happy to potentially generalize on this historical one:\n
I believe there is a mass lesion in the right frontal lobe, but, to be honest, I'm quite unsure if there is any intracranial hemorrhage! My guess would be 'any' = 0. Any opposing prediction from your well regularized model or from brave experts ?
", "rawMarkdown": "It is interesting to mention in the context of this competition that the first brain CT scan was taken on 1 october 1971.\n\nThose who train their model on 64x64 images must be happy to potentially generalize on this historical one:\n\n\nI believe there is a mass lesion in the right frontal lobe, but, to be honest, I'm quite unsure if there is any intracranial hemorrhage! My guess would be 'any' = 0. Any opposing prediction from your well regularized model or from brave experts ?", "votes": 9 }, { "id": 639032, "postDate": "2019-10-02T17:42:44.757Z", "content": "why you think 64x64 images will generalize?
", "rawMarkdown": "why you think 64x64 images will generalize?", "votes": -2, "replies": [ { "id": 639036, "postDate": "2019-10-02T17:49:43.027Z", "content": "@mobassir don't take this subject too seriously. It is mostly for fun. The original image simply looks like a 64x64 image which is great for 1971 but awful compared to 2019 standards for an appropriate interpretation.
", "rawMarkdown": "@mobassir don't take this subject too seriously. It is mostly for fun. The original image simply looks like a 64x64 image which is great for 1971 but awful compared to 2019 standards for an appropriate interpretation." } ] } ], "comments": [ { "id": 639032, "author_name": "Mobassir", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2019-10-02T17:42:44.757000", "content": "why you think 64x64 images will generalize?
", "votes": -2, "replies": [ { "id": 639036, "author_name": "Alexandre Cadrin-Chênevert", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2019-10-02T17:49:43.027000", "content": "@mobassir don't take this subject too seriously. It is mostly for fun. The original image simply looks like a 64x64 image which is great for 1971 but awful compared to 2019 standards for an appropriate interpretation.
", "votes": 0, "replies": [] } ] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "639014": "It is interesting to mention in the context of this competition that the first brain CT scan was taken on 1 october 1971.\n\nThose who train their model on 64x64 images must be happy to potentially generalize on this historical one:\n\n\nI believe there is a mass lesion in the right frontal lobe, but, to be honest, I'm quite unsure if there is any intracranial hemorrhage! My guess would be 'any' = 0. Any opposing prediction from your well regularized model or from brave experts ?", "639032": "why you think 64x64 images will generalize?" } }