{
  "id": 686737,
  "title": "Why is the score displayed this way?",
  "url": "/competitions/stanford-rna-3d-folding-2/discussion/686737",
  "author_name": "Dylan Xue",
  "post_date": "2026-04-01T02:56:41.481000",
  "votes": 1,
  "comment_count": 2,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>I’m not sure what happened, but I’m pretty sure I’m not the only one dealing with this. Can anyone explain why?\nI don't have much of an issue with the score itself, but I'm curious why it's displayed this way.</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": 3432951,
      "postDate": "2026-04-01T03:24:24.333Z",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/dylanxue04\" target=\"_blank\">@dylanxue04</a>, the private LB scores of 0.516/0.534 compared to their public LB scores are great and your models performed very well with the data we were given during the competition.  What we all ended up with as a private LB score is an after thought decision the competition organizers took which some of us believe is unprofessional. I have explained my thoughts in a full post <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/stanford-rna-3d-folding-2/discussion/686651\" target=\"_blank\">here</a> which I am not going to repeat. </p>\n<p>Take heart in the fact that you did what you are supposed to do and designed 2 very good models that scored very well. Don't let the moving of the goal after the fact by the organizers take that away from you.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "@dylanxue04, the private LB scores of 0.516/0.534 compared to their public LB scores are great and your models performed very well with the data we were given during the competition.  What we all ended up with as a private LB score is an after thought decision the competition organizers took which some of us believe is unprofessional. I have explained my thoughts in a full post [here](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/stanford-rna-3d-folding-2/discussion/686651) which I am not going to repeat. \n\nTake heart in the fact that you did what you are supposed to do and designed 2 very good models that scored very well. Don't let the moving of the goal after the fact by the organizers take that away from you.",
      "votes": 4
    },
    {
      "id": 3432935,
      "postDate": "2026-04-01T02:56:41.483Z",
      "content": "<p>I’m not sure what happened, but I’m pretty sure I’m not the only one dealing with this. Can anyone explain why?\nI don't have much of an issue with the score itself, but I'm curious why it's displayed this way.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I’m not sure what happened, but I’m pretty sure I’m not the only one dealing with this. Can anyone explain why?\nI don't have much of an issue with the score itself, but I'm curious why it's displayed this way.",
      "votes": 1
    },
    {
      "id": 3432949,
      "postDate": "2026-04-01T03:23:21.970Z",
      "content": "<p>Same question from me.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Same question from me."
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 3432951,
      "author_name": "YaGana Sheriff-Hussaini",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2026-04-01T03:24:24.333000",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/dylanxue04\" target=\"_blank\">@dylanxue04</a>, the private LB scores of 0.516/0.534 compared to their public LB scores are great and your models performed very well with the data we were given during the competition.  What we all ended up with as a private LB score is an after thought decision the competition organizers took which some of us believe is unprofessional. I have explained my thoughts in a full post <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/stanford-rna-3d-folding-2/discussion/686651\" target=\"_blank\">here</a> which I am not going to repeat. </p>\n<p>Take heart in the fact that you did what you are supposed to do and designed 2 very good models that scored very well. Don't let the moving of the goal after the fact by the organizers take that away from you.</p>",
      "votes": 4,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 3432949,
      "author_name": "OverfitOracle",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2026-04-01T03:23:21.970000",
      "content": "<p>Same question from me.</p>",
      "votes": 0,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "3432951": "@dylanxue04, the private LB scores of 0.516/0.534 compared to their public LB scores are great and your models performed very well with the data we were given during the competition.  What we all ended up with as a private LB score is an after thought decision the competition organizers took which some of us believe is unprofessional. I have explained my thoughts in a full post [here](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/stanford-rna-3d-folding-2/discussion/686651) which I am not going to repeat. \n\nTake heart in the fact that you did what you are supposed to do and designed 2 very good models that scored very well. Don't let the moving of the goal after the fact by the organizers take that away from you.",
    "3432935": "I’m not sure what happened, but I’m pretty sure I’m not the only one dealing with this. Can anyone explain why?\nI don't have much of an issue with the score itself, but I'm curious why it's displayed this way.",
    "3432949": "Same question from me."
  }
}